The Causes of the War of 1812 essays

The Causes of the War of 1812 essays The War of 1812 was not just a battle against an external foe but stemmed from internal problems as well. The external enemy that the United States was facing was Britain, but that was not the most severe dilemma that they faced. The real problem that was occurring during this time was the internal struggle going on in the United States of America. These internal conflicts consisted of matters such as the issue of the north part of the country which was federalist did not want to go into war, but the south part of the states, which were anti-federalist wanted to go into war. Another issue was the war hawks, a group of western and southern leaders that was firmly Republican in their party's loyalty and encouraged war; the war hawks would become a cause for more internal problems facing the United States during the period around the War of 1812. One issue that supports the statement that internal struggle was a factor that led to the War of 1812 is the issue of the dispute between the northern part of the United States; which, being mostly federalist, was loyal to the British, not wanting to go to war and the southern part of the United States, having enough of the British presence on U.S. soil, wanting to go to war. This dispute was over whether or not to go to war; anger and rage flew back and forth during the heated debates about facing Britain in a battle or just backing off. The north wanted to back off and did not want war, while the south craved to get Britain out of the U.S and teach them a lesson. This caused great conflict in Congress and the government as a whole. This conflict grew in size and was one of the major reasons that the U.S. decided to go to war with Britain, without the influence spurred by this conflict, war may have never occurred. The last issue that caused U.S. internal conflict was the presence of the war hawks, a group of southern and western leaders that encouraged war against Britain due to th...

The Plan for the Filipino Peop essays

The Plan for the Filipino Peop essays A. Definition of parliamentary government B. History of the parliamentary system C. Present day problem of the Philippines II. Efficiency of the parliamentary system III. Systematic way of running the government IV. Corruption will be seen and be secured A. No branch of government will get to much power B. Prime Minister can be dismissed easily when confidence is negotiable V. Weaknesses of the parliamentary system B. Legislature cannot talk back VI. Parliamentary is better than presidential system Some Filipinos believe that the Philippines is better off with a parliamentary government over a presidential one. According to a san diego examiner reporter more and more Filipinos believe that the current system cannot solve the problems like mass poverty, unemployment, corruption, violence, criminality, and rebellion without consistent basic education, health, and social services (www.sandiegoexaminer.net/news/anmviewer.htm 2003, par. 11). With the threat of great legal powers, physical force, and the possibility of tyranny, we use the presidential system because we adopted it 70 years ago under the American colonial rule the reporter stresses upon (www.sandiegoexaminer.net/news/anmviewer 2003, par.4). According to my research there are a lot more parliamentary democracies than presidential democracies in the world today (Ranney, n.d, p.228). The parliamentary system is much more favored by most countries because it simply works better. The comparison is that although the Presidential form of government gives more rights to the people and exudes freedom, the Parliamentary system is more efficient in laws and regulations, has a systematic way of running the government, and the problem with corruption will be greatly lessened. The parliamentary government can improve the Philippines by far because it is more efficient. Even our madam President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo said that the nation will be better...

Cosmopolitanism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 1

Cosmopolitanism - Essay Example While in Europe he integrated with Romany people that his English contemporaries. His integration with the people enabled him to acquire Gypsy wandering culture. For instance while he was in Marseilles, France he learned Modern Greek, French, Italian, and Neapolitan dialect. Those languages came handy when the family traversed Europe especially France and Italy before settling in Britain. He learned an intermediate language between French and Spanish called BÃ ©arnaise in addition to classical Greek and Latin. I think Burton was an exemplary linguistic and a great European swordsperson that saw him expelled at Britain’s Oxford college since he had contravened one of its by-laws against mixing with other races. He challenged a fellow Oxford college student that had heard of his prowess with the Saber that ridiculed his walrus moustache. Burton later traveled to Asia to work for the East India Company in Sindth, India. He learned Gujarati, Marathi, Persian, and Afghan. He deepened his Arabic and Persian languages that he had started learning while in England. He traveled to the Arabian Peninsula in 1853 and admitted to Mecca and Medina as a pilgrim while he posed as a Pathan from India’s Northwest Frontier Province. Later on in 1858, he traveled to Africa together with his colleague John Hanning Speke. Historically, they were the first Europeans to see Lake Tanganyika. . Other places he visited in Africa included Somalia, Sierra Leone, Ghana, Lagos, and Cape Coast.